Tuesday, August 16, 2022

Mo Yan wins Nobel Prize in literature 2012

spot_imgspot_img

Chinese author Mo Yan, becomes the first Chinese citizen ever to win the Nobel prize in literature.  He was chosen as the 2012 recipient for works with qualities of “hallucinatory realism” that mixes folk tales, history and the contemporary. Born in 1955 to parents who were farmers, Mo Yan – a pseudonym for Guan Moye; the pen name means “don’t speak” – grew up in Gaomi in Shandong province in north-eastern China. The Cultural Revolution forced him to leave school at 12, and he went to work in the fields, completing his education in the army. The backdrops for his various works have included the 1911 revolution that toppled China’s last imperial dynasty, Japan’s brutal wartime invasion, newly Communist China’s failed land-reform policies of the 1950s and the madness of Mao Zedong’s 1966-76 Cultural Revolution. The author’s works include Red SorgumThe Garlic BalladsLife and Death Are Wearing Me Out and Change among others. Through a mixture of fantasy and reality, historical and social perspectives, Mo Yan has created a world reminiscent in its complexity of those in the writings of William Faulkner and Gabriel García Márquez, at the same time finding a departure point in old Chinese literature and in oral tradition. In addition to his novels, Mo Yan has published many short stories and essays on various topics, and despite his social criticism is seen in his homeland as one of the foremost contemporary authors. Readers in India eager to acquaint themselves with his writings will have to wait for a while to reach those in Indian markets.

IR
IR
Editorial Team of Indian Ruminations.

1 COMMENT

  1. The report on Mo Yan is briefly good. Good arrangements in organised ezine. Thnaks for sending-
    Aju Mukhopadhyay

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

*

Spotlight

spot_imgspot_img

Revisiting Ambedkar’s Vision of ‘United States of India’: Can It Stand as Modern India’s Viable Alternative?

In April 2020, Thiruvananthapuram MP Shashi Tharoor waded into the debate, arguing that a Presidential system would prevent the “one-man show” that the Indian system has evolved into. The proponents of this line of thought also cite the United States' (relative) political stability as one of the key reasons to support their argument. The proposal challenges the Indian Constitution’s “Basic structure doctrine” decided by the Supreme Court in the Kesavananda Bharathi case. However, this requires further examination: a Presidential form of government might fix some of India’s political gridlock, but it may also open Pandora’s Box, releasing a whole wake of issues in its place. This includes a politically biased Supreme Court and horse-trading of MPs on a scale unheard in Indian politics.

Reconstructing our solidarity with the farmers’ protest

The controversial farm laws brought by the union government are essentially about the agricultural market. As the domains (Agriculture and the...

Sharapova: Victim of Fate or of False Regulatory Mechanism?- Dr. Razeena Kuzhimandapathil, Kerala

Maria Yuryevna Sharapova definitely had a controversial career both inside and outside tennis courts. She has the talent that...

Must read

Reviewing ‘Obsession and Wild Pigeon’ by Ismat Chughtai

My interest in Ismat Chughtai developed when I first...
- Advertisement -spot_img

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you