Tuesday, August 9, 2022

Condemn this cultural emergency

spot_imgspot_img

We condemn the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting’s denial of giving censor exemption for three documentaries from showing in International Documentary & Short Film Festival of Kerala (IDSFFK) on 16th June at Thiruvananthapuram. It is unfortunate, unwanted as well as an expression of cultural intolerance only. In this period of bans such a move from MIB is neither unexpected nor surprising but it is shocking to know that the Ministry is not even bothered to give a proper, valid and reasonable explanation for not giving censor exemption for these films. These three documentaries will have politically disagreeing content for Ministry but banning them is nothing but a cowardly act. Banning is a kind of murder. Banning an artistic performance is exposing the baselessness of counter arguments that establishments have. Last year, too, the MIB denied permission for two documentaries and till now gave no reason for doing so.

All three documentaries are about those incidents that can disturb the rightwing Hinduthwa. “March March March” is about JNU student movement of last year directed by Kathu Luckose who is a student there. The film is portraying the eventual development of the movement through different events and interviews. The second one is “The Unbearable Being of Lightness” directed by P N Ramachandra. It is about Rohit Vimula of HCU. “In the Shade of Fallen Chinar” directed by N C Fazil and Shawn Sebastian tries to draw how art takes the form of resistance in a conflict-ridden society. The Ministry is giving a vague explanation that these documentaries will trigger communal intolerance. Last year Ministry denied permission for Jayan Cherian’s “Ka Bodyscpes” and Majid Majidi’s “Muhammed” without citing any reason. The ban advocacy in art field of this government is reaching new heights through this act.

It was in 2015 Home Ministry banned Leslee Udwin’s ‘India’s Daughter’ by citing reasons such as ‘victim’s parents will be upset”, “film would affect tourism” etc. We saw the ‘mob’ banning of ‘Mathorubagan’ by Perumal Murugan. Remember, ban anything that the “rulers” do not like is exactly what fascism (more than dictatorship) about. Tolerance towards anti-establishment artistic performances is one way of scaling the heights of democracy one nation has.

These three documentaries are tributes to those youngsters who joined hands in order to question the orthodoxy and false as well as fake national honour. They never scared about lathi-charges and water cannons. They are spirited with idea of freedom and strengthened with unity. Your administrative dictations will not pour that revolutionary fire. Instead of becoming the inmates of dustbins (of history), rise to the maturity of tolerance and comradeship. In the contemporary world, it is spaces like film festivals exposes the scale of democracy that society enjoys. It is better to not approach them with your cultural intolerance.

Chief Editor
Indian Ruminations

IR
IR
Editorial Team of Indian Ruminations.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

*

Spotlight

spot_imgspot_img

Revisiting Ambedkar’s Vision of ‘United States of India’: Can It Stand as Modern India’s Viable Alternative?

In April 2020, Thiruvananthapuram MP Shashi Tharoor waded into the debate, arguing that a Presidential system would prevent the “one-man show” that the Indian system has evolved into. The proponents of this line of thought also cite the United States' (relative) political stability as one of the key reasons to support their argument. The proposal challenges the Indian Constitution’s “Basic structure doctrine” decided by the Supreme Court in the Kesavananda Bharathi case. However, this requires further examination: a Presidential form of government might fix some of India’s political gridlock, but it may also open Pandora’s Box, releasing a whole wake of issues in its place. This includes a politically biased Supreme Court and horse-trading of MPs on a scale unheard in Indian politics.

Reconstructing our solidarity with the farmers’ protest

The controversial farm laws brought by the union government are essentially about the agricultural market. As the domains (Agriculture and the...

Sharapova: Victim of Fate or of False Regulatory Mechanism?- Dr. Razeena Kuzhimandapathil, Kerala

Maria Yuryevna Sharapova definitely had a controversial career both inside and outside tennis courts. She has the talent that...

Must read

Reviewing ‘Obsession and Wild Pigeon’ by Ismat Chughtai

My interest in Ismat Chughtai developed when I first...
- Advertisement -spot_img

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you