Tuesday, July 5, 2022

Indian English, Srinivas S, Chennai


True! Some of us do pronounce ‘cough’ as ‘cuff’
(And it strangles our throats a wee bit),
While others rhyme ‘god’ with ‘ode’
(But no, we really don’t find it odd).
We sometimes ‘ban’ such things as ‘vans’,
And round out the words ‘love’ and ‘dove’,
Cajoling ‘V’ to become the ‘W’ in we!
We also ‘yescape’ boring ‘filims’,
Exiting well before the ‘inter-well’;
And reply with a firm ‘es’,
When someone ‘aks’ us if that’s what we did!
Down South, we love our consonants hard
(And our summer-given spices hot),
So ‘three’ is seldom mistaken for ‘free’
(Unless our fricatives wish to pay, as they do at times,
Counterfeit homage to colonial claustrophobia).
Up North and elsewhere,
Some of us like an extra vowel –
So you might hear us complain
About our children’s ‘ischools’–
And dislike silent consonants,
So ‘Iron Man’ becomes ‘I-run-Man’!
In the West
(Where the resilience of the country’s trade
Mingles with the resonant romances of the Arabian Sea)
You may hear some of us making ‘deci-juns’,
‘Be-kiss’ it is fun
(And not because it rhymes with ‘sons’).

In the North-East
(Where clouds and the snow-clad peaks of mountains
Make silent, plaintive music)
We speak English-us pulsating with the tonal rhythms
Pulsing through the winds of the Orient;
Our words at times spoken quicker
Than a misty veil is drawn over the Kanchenjunga.

Many of us speak in more than one tongue,
And our English is – our Englishes are –
But an adopted and unapologetic expression
Of our hearts’ songs:

It sings – they hum – of the climes we inhabit
(Hark! The breath in our English vowels
From the winds of our long coasts);
Has borrowed from our kitchens
(‘Chutney’ auto-corrects to ‘gurney’ no more);
And remains yet clear, for the most part,
Within and beyond the bounds of home.

What is there to regret then, what to change,
As English recompenses us with its mind;
While we renew it with our hearts
And every new pair of lungs
That takes it in and breathes it out?

Editorial Team of Indian Ruminations.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here




Revisiting Ambedkar’s Vision of ‘United States of India’: Can It Stand as Modern India’s Viable Alternative?

In April 2020, Thiruvananthapuram MP Shashi Tharoor waded into the debate, arguing that a Presidential system would prevent the “one-man show” that the Indian system has evolved into. The proponents of this line of thought also cite the United States' (relative) political stability as one of the key reasons to support their argument. The proposal challenges the Indian Constitution’s “Basic structure doctrine” decided by the Supreme Court in the Kesavananda Bharathi case. However, this requires further examination: a Presidential form of government might fix some of India’s political gridlock, but it may also open Pandora’s Box, releasing a whole wake of issues in its place. This includes a politically biased Supreme Court and horse-trading of MPs on a scale unheard in Indian politics.

Reconstructing our solidarity with the farmers’ protest

The controversial farm laws brought by the union government are essentially about the agricultural market. As the domains (Agriculture and the...

Sharapova: Victim of Fate or of False Regulatory Mechanism?- Dr. Razeena Kuzhimandapathil, Kerala

Maria Yuryevna Sharapova definitely had a controversial career both inside and outside tennis courts. She has the talent that...

Must read

Reviewing ‘Obsession and Wild Pigeon’ by Ismat Chughtai

My interest in Ismat Chughtai developed when I first...
- Advertisement -spot_img

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you